I hate 'em. I guess it makes for a good 'track' look, but not for the street, IMO. I've also heard they've collected quite a bit of shin flesh from their owners... OW
Of course I don't have a car yet, but I plan to have no quickjacks or bumpers. The bumpers would be a good idea to protect the body from being hit, but if the quickjacks aren't functional, maybe the frame isn't strong enough for the bumpers to work properly either... I'm not that fond of chrome, so the bumpers don't do much for me either.
The front quickjacks don't support the body, but the back ones do. My plan is to have no holes drilled for either the front or back, then mount a nut inside the back of the body to attach those two points to the frame. If you can successfully fill the front holes, you could fill the back ones easily.
I have the bumperettes. I think they look cleaner than the QJ and add a small (very) amount of protection. They dont hurt nearly as much as a QJ
when you walk by them and as some one else said you wont have to answer the third question!
I prefer the look of the Over-riders than the quick jacks. Someday, on my never-ending list of Christmas and B-day presents, I should have them. I've still got a knot in my shin from pinning my leg under one of the quick jacks while trying to answer the phone. (go figure, it was my mother-in-law calling)
A forum community dedicated to Factory Five owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, racing, conversions, modifications, troubleshooting and drivetrain. We discuss MK4, GTM, 818, Type 65 coupe, roadsters, and more!