Rod, when you get your set up done could you take a measurement of the total width between inner tie rod ends at centers? I'm curious if it comes out the same as mine. I don't think many have done this and the tech at Flaming River said that there might be some interest in making a rack for our cars but needed a length. I don't think he should use just one measurement but with yours and if enough of us come up with the same number then he'd have something to go from. Will you have to make boot extenders also? Nice work!
__________________
Einar
F5R1004522RD, Aluminum 427 Windsor, 2-4bbls, 530 hp, TKO 600, Full Width Roll Bar, Narrowed 8.8 w/ 9 inch axles, 3.27 gears, torsen, VPM sway bar, Composite Tech Trunk Lid.
Einar,
Will do once I have my set up complete. They should be able to base it off the length of the extensions since they would already have the length (I assume) of the standard rack.
You seem to be making some excellent progress on this problem! How did you calculate the exact length of the extensions? I will most likely play with this myself this winter, so if I can follow your thought process it will really help! I'm not sure if those thread sizes you used would be the same for all of the racks. I have the 15:1 that looks like the Flaming River, but is made by Unisteer, I think. Do you know if they all use interchangeable inner joints?
thanks, Brian
__________________
FFR 1686 (copperhead) Black with copper stripes - on the road 9/03! Dual-quad, aluminum headed 5.0 with IRS, and 3.55 gears - Sold and headed for the Autobaun!
Hi Brian,
Sorry I missed you question back in August! I believe the FR racks may used different rod ends than the stock Mustang rack that i am using. My rack has male threads on the ends and the inner tie-rod has a femal thread. I think the FR racks are the opposite. I think someone else posted a while back about some extensions they made for the FR rack.
[quote}Kingpin inclination angle. The FFR roadster has a terrible SAI due to the requirement to adapt the stock mcphersion type spindles to a double A arm suspension. About the only thing you can do to improve it is to adapt a different spindle to the chassis.[/quote}
David, I'm a complete noob when it comes to suspension stuff. What exactly does this invention of yours do to help the suspension in a Roadster? Is it it a "track only" part, or would this be beneficial to the street and country back road drivers as well? I saw this posted quite some time ago in the spec racer forum, but don't have a grip on what it actually does.
__________________
FFR 1686 (copperhead) Black with copper stripes - on the road 9/03! Dual-quad, aluminum headed 5.0 with IRS, and 3.55 gears - Sold and headed for the Autobaun!
Obviously David can tell you exactly what the SAI mod does better than I can, and there is a good discussion of this mod on the auto-x forum, but the adapters that David and others designed will replace the IFS bracket along with changing the mounting point of the upper control arm to help eliminate suspension design compromises that FFR was forced to make by using donor suspension parts (the spindles). Not too many people have done this mod yet, but I remember reading that at least one person felt that stability was improved on the freeway. Also I dont think that the kit was intended for cars with pindrive length control arms.
__________________
MkII, CHP 331 w/AFR 185\'s, Mass Flo, TKO, IRS, \"deep dish\" Team III\'s.
I have 89 spindles and Gordon Levy's bump steer kit on a Mark III. This is a fantastic setup and very reasonable.
If you want to have a total solution to your bump steer issues you need to check this out with Gordon.
__________________
Shep Qualified old guy. Dad of Willspeed. 89 Donor.Mk. III IRS, 302,equal length headers, 65 mm throttle body 77 mm MAF,Kenne Bell Supercharger,Levy bump steer kit & Koni Shocks.Finish line nudge bars, Cobra Earl Trunk, FFMetal batbox and footbox,APE hardtop, Vintage A/C, Lucas windscreen washer. Detailed, painted, graduated. Driving, adding stuff.
f4sfed, It doesn't have anything to do with the bumpsteer, as that is a rack/tierod location issue, so that still needs to be dialed in on a case by case basis. Should matter which MK version the car is...
I'm really curious as to whether it is worthwhile to do the SAI mod for a mostly street car.
__________________
FFR 1686 (copperhead) Black with copper stripes - on the road 9/03! Dual-quad, aluminum headed 5.0 with IRS, and 3.55 gears - Sold and headed for the Autobaun!
Guys, go over to the auto-X forum and check out all the comments made about the SAI mod. There are also lots of fixes for the bumpsteer problem in these cars, Levy has a good kit, some have made rack extenders, others have bought custom racks. Do a search on bumpsteer in this forum and you will find way too much information.
__________________
MkII, CHP 331 w/AFR 185\'s, Mass Flo, TKO, IRS, \"deep dish\" Team III\'s.
There has been some time on this, and I have to ask. How is the car to drive with the extensions? Have you added the SAI mod? Is it a beast to drive on what Gordon brought up?
__________________
331, RPM intake, TW heads, TF STG II cam, 3:55, powerjection III, 3550 trans, NT-03M Enkei 18x8.5 & 9.5, Kumho XS 245-40 \ 275-35, 3-link, Fast Freddies PS, ABS
Hi Mike,
Here's a pic. As I said earlier it is a butchered, but accurate, setup using used parts since I didn’t feel like risking my new parts for the cause.
Might not look like it here but the brake disk is facing straight forward in this picture. You can see that the rack is out further than normal (1-3/4"). And the old stock outer tie rod is tighter to the steering arm than it normally would be. My steering arm is drilled trough for the Comp Eng bumsteer outer rod end so that allowed me to tighten the stock end up tighter. You can see I had to use spacers under the nut because I ran out of threads on the tie rod stud.
Cheers, Rod
Bringing this thread back up - excellent reading. However from what I gather the goal of the extenders is to get the inner tie rod pivot point in the same plane as the inboard pivot points of the upper and lower control arms. However looking at this picture, it appears that it is now outboard. If it was in the same plane, shouldn't it be positioned right in front of the vertical 2 x 2 that sits between the two LCA mounting points? It appears to be sitting well outboard of that.
Am I missing something here Rod?
__________________
Howard
408W, IRS, TKO600, PS, PB, QF SS 750, POM Sept 2010.
FFR 6817 // Delivery Date: 11/20/08 // Roller: 9/25/09 // First Engine Start: 3/31/10 // Gokart: 4/11/10 // Painted: 7/2/10 //Graduated 10/03/10. Graduation thread with my progress links is here.
What matters is the length of the arm relative to the height of the arm relative to everything else. When you turn the wheel, the inner and outer are no longer in alignment anyway (in front of the verrticle 2x2).
__________________
331, RPM intake, TW heads, TF STG II cam, 3:55, powerjection III, 3550 trans, NT-03M Enkei 18x8.5 & 9.5, Kumho XS 245-40 \ 275-35, 3-link, Fast Freddies PS, ABS
Bringing this thread back up - excellent reading. However from what I gather the goal of the extenders is to get the inner tie rod pivot point in the same plane as the inboard pivot points of the upper and lower control arms. However looking at this picture, it appears that it is now outboard. If it was in the same plane, shouldn't it be positioned right in front of the vertical 2 x 2 that sits between the two LCA mounting points? It appears to be sitting well outboard of that.
Am I missing something here Rod?
Howard,
Sorry, must have missed this when you brought it back up. Take a look at post #10 in this thread for an answer to your question.
Welcome to FFCars! The
representations expressed are the representations and opinions of
the FFCars.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. This website
has been planned and developed by FFCars.com and its forum members
and should not be construed as being endorsed by Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company for any
purpose. "FFR", "Factory Five", "Factory Five Racing", and the
Factory Five Racing logo are registered trademarks of Factory Five
Racing, Inc. FFCars.com forum members agree not to
post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is
owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages
posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these
messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason
whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your
messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with
respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s).
Thank you for visiting the FFCars.com Forum dedicated to Factory
Five.