I have set a goal for my mk4 build. My goal is to have 400 hp and get 30 mpg. Not sure how much work will be involved to do this but i was wondering what people are geting in their 4.6 set ups.
4.6 SOHC, T45, 3.27
10000 miles and I consistently average between 19 and 23 depending on how I drive.
__________________
Kevin
Mark III - Sold - 4.6 SOHC and Silver with Blue stripes.
Mark IV - Work in progress. Aluminum 4.6 DOHC. My daughter still wants it to be Pink with Purple stripes.
Or find a strictly downhill route. Otherwise, not going to happen unless you eliminate the performance (e.g. go to skinny/hard tires, silly gearing, ride height reduction, low slung spoilers, modifications to body bulges, ......). In which case, why build a Cobra?
__________________
Rick
Mk IV 7329, '04 Mach 1 donor, 3 link, FFR lowers, heater, Kirkey seats w/seat heaters, dual rollbars, Kumho Ecsta XS 255/315s on 9/10.5 x 17 Halibrand replicas; , Lexus Indigo Ink Pearl/Arctic White stripes
-picked up 9/25/10
-first start 3/9/12
-go kart 3/18/12
-complete 7/24/12 http://s1183.photobucket.com/albums/...0Construction/
Too much frontal area and too high a drag coef. Better off to build a coupe.
My best MPG to date was 22 mpg
__________________
Build started 15 Dec. 2002
Registered June 2009, kit delivered December 2002. Levy Stage 4,347,EFI TKOII, IRS, FFR 4 into 4 pipes, Roh 17 inch wheels, Nitto 555's, 275/40/17, 245/45/17. Power steering, C&R Water to oil heat exchanger. Levy / Ron Davis big radiator. Tweeker RT, WB O2 system. Street performer seats, tracks both sides, Levy pro bump steer, SN95 front spindles, FFR LCA's, Levy / Willwood brakes.
Lomborghini titanium silver, painted by Gordon Levy.
I know its not as aerodynamic, but my C5 gets 31mpg hwy with a mild cam and 385rwhp.
C5 Corvette? The C5 corvette is a pretty slippery car. Coef of drag From Corvette Fever:
C5=.334, C6=.343. In terms of drag they measured how much HP it took to reach 100 MPH. The numbers were: C5=128.6, C6=133.0
As far as the original poster...
There should be a pretty obvious problem of creating HP and preserving MPG, as in the two are in direct odds with each other. City mileage favors mass more, in which the FF cars do well, while highway is more related to drag. Expanding an engine's capability to generate peak horsepower is always going to remove it from the it's effeciency sweet spot and lower the MPG.
I would love to see someone build a Cobra with one of the modern 300+ HP V6s from Ford or Chevy. These engines are using all the latest technologies to get a staggering ~30 MPG in big 4 seater coupes, imagine what they could do in an ultra lightweight Cobra build. Going with a V6, a T5 Tranny, and possibly a Ford 8" rear eng with a Currie center section (saves 70 lbs over a 9") might shave more than 200 pounds off of an already flyweight car... From there you might do performance upgrades to trade MPG for more HP, but these engines are already so high tech and effecient that there might not be too much more to be had besides capacity expansion.
I'm going to be attempting 400hp and near 30mpg from a 347 windsor, megasquirt 3 lean burn, a T56, and a 3.07 rear-end. I've got the 400hp, and I should be able to spin very low RPM in 6th gear at highway speeds.
I'll certainly be posting about this when all is complete.
Build your car with an electric motor . . . 30 Mpg very possible . . .
My signature line gets me 23 on the open road.
Doc
__________________
little block, BIG BLOCK . . . HUMMMMMMM? FFR3712K (POPSDRM) in Lost Wages, NV. MKII, 5.0, GT40-EFI, E-303, T5, 17" 5-Lug Chrome Cobra "R's", 315's, PBR 4 wheel Disks, Full Tubular suspension, Flaming River, 3.73:1 3-Link, Drop Butt mod, Dash forward mod, Footbox Air vents, Custom Turn Signals, Custom 4-into-4 headers, Non-Donor build, Ford Royal Blue Pearl w/ Arctic White stripes.
Last edited by Big Blocker; 02-02-2013 at 01:55 PM..
Reason: added info
Where do you put the gallons into an electric motor? A gas powered generator to power the electric motor?
__________________
Build started 15 Dec. 2002
Registered June 2009, kit delivered December 2002. Levy Stage 4,347,EFI TKOII, IRS, FFR 4 into 4 pipes, Roh 17 inch wheels, Nitto 555's, 275/40/17, 245/45/17. Power steering, C&R Water to oil heat exchanger. Levy / Ron Davis big radiator. Tweeker RT, WB O2 system. Street performer seats, tracks both sides, Levy pro bump steer, SN95 front spindles, FFR LCA's, Levy / Willwood brakes.
Lomborghini titanium silver, painted by Gordon Levy.
C5 Corvette? The C5 corvette is a pretty slippery car. Coef of drag From Corvette Fever:
C5=.334, C6=.343. In terms of drag they measured how much HP it took to reach 100 MPH. The numbers were: C5=128.6, C6=133.0
Bob
My 2005 C6 Corvette got 32 mpg at steady 75 mph (stock except for Vararam CAI, ported intake manifold, Magnaflow cat back, and a very nice computer tune) - approx. 440 hp, 3.42 gears and six speed manual trans. 3180 lbs. (about the same highway mpg as my 2005 Civic 1.7 liter)
My 2008 C6 Corvette gets 28 to 29 mpg at steady 75 mph (Haltech CAI, computer tune, GM bimode exhaust) - approx. 450 hp, 3.42 gears and six speed manual trans. 3200 lbs
Some of this is due to coeff of drag advantage, but the LS2 and LS3 engines are very efficient engines, lots of overdrive in the trans, and the engines respond well to a tune and minor mods (especially the LS2)
It's not a linear function, but if it takes 133 HP to get your C6 to reach 100 mph, what would it be to hold 70 mph? 90~100 HP? Less? A Cobra coef of drag is no where near the C5s or C6s. The front swallows a bunch of air then forces it under the car while the windshield has a lot in common with the one on my Wrangler. One big MPG mod would be to swap out the windshield for a Challenge windscreen, but this isn't a very practical solution.
The adiabatic efficiency of an engine (how much of the fuel's heat is actually converted to kinetic energy) largely has to do with compression ratio, but other issues like the mass of the rotating assembly and flame front propagation (as it effects ignition timing) can have a substantial effect as well.
30 MPG in a Cobra is definately possible, but I do think it will take a lot of the latest engine technology to maintain that MPG performance while moving the peak HP up to the levels that some on this thread are seeking (as in the high feature V6s). Is the combination of direct fuel injection, varaible valve timing, and drive by wire appearing on any American V8s yet?
Failing that I think I'd approach it using small displacement & high RPM's to make HP. A centered sparkplug (3 or 4 valve) modular V8 with the smallest displacement and lightest pistons and rods available and a really good ECU with sequential fuel injection and an adjustable reaction to engine knock as I would want to push the compression ratio up (probably Electromotive TEC). Probably try to get it to a 8000 RPM redline. I'd also probably vent the engine bay to the sides of the car by enlarging and reshaping the side vents.
None of this is cheap, which is why the high feature V6s are attractive for power and economy (but completely non-traditional). Ford has added airbags in the seats of the Mustang, which means that they will be totaled with much less actual damage as just the airbag deployment is a costly repair. Do a google search on "2013 Mustang V6 salvage" to see the condition on some of these 'totaled' cars...
__________________
FFR7346, Levy Stage 5.5 427w on Dart Aluminum w/Brodix STS 225 heads, Levy Equal Length Headers, Levy SA T5, Ron Davis Radiator, Wilwood 6/4 Superlites, IRS, 3.55 w/Torsen T2, and Digital Guard Dawg
I have set a goal for my mk4 build. My goal is to have 400 hp and get 30 mpg. Not sure how much work will be involved to do this but i was wondering what people are geting in their 4.6 set ups.
I am willing to bet, if you accomplish your goal of having a Cobra that gets 30 mpg on the highway, you will never actually be able to do it. Remember you have a right foot and everyone that I know likes to use theirs.
Roy from Springboro
__________________
My toys: #6028RD FFR Mark III and #373 Saleen of 373 Saleens produced in 1999
Welcome to FFCars! The
representations expressed are the representations and opinions of
the FFCars.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. This website
has been planned and developed by FFCars.com and its forum members
and should not be construed as being endorsed by Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company for any
purpose. "FFR", "Factory Five", "Factory Five Racing", and the
Factory Five Racing logo are registered trademarks of Factory Five
Racing, Inc. FFCars.com forum members agree not to
post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is
owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages
posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these
messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason
whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your
messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with
respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s).
Thank you for visiting the FFCars.com Forum dedicated to Factory
Five.