OK, I have a chance to possibly trade my neighbor my '06 Custom built Harley Road Glide for his '69 SS/RS camaro.
From my research, I know the car was built in Van Nuys, Ca. Because of that and the way that factory did their trim tags, you can't tell if it's a real SS or not. But the guy who sold the car to my neighbor said it was. The engine has been swapped out for a '69 truck 350 so it's not original and makes it even harder to tell of the SS designation.
It does have all the right markings and the front disc brakes. The hood is a all steel cowl induction hood, which was an option back then. It has all of the RS package, side vent chrome, back up lights below the bumper, etc, except for the console gauges are missing along with the high back bucket seats.
According to the trim tag, it was originally Cortez silver with a vinal roof. The vinal roof was removed when it was painted a dark gray and it now sports black SS stripes. It has a TH350 tranny.
The only issue I have found so far, other than a relocated battery in the trunk, is according to a camaro web site I found, they say that the style of trim tag that the car has was not used on cars with this low of a serial number. Could that be an issue or just a mistake on the website.
I know my neighbor paid 13K for the car and it has a fresh paint job. I know I coulkd sell my bike for about 15K if I really tried. So does it sound like a decent trade? Anything I should really be looking for on the car?
__________________
Have you THANKED a VETERAN lately for the freedoms you take for granted each day?
To me there is just too much wrong w/ it from an originality standpoint. Not that it isn't a decent car, but I don't think it will appreciate much.
__________________
FFR 5353K,351/400hp,TKO 500, 3-link w/3.08 and Truetrac, Koni DA coilovers front and rear,APE hardtop,Forte front and VPM rear swaybars
Thanks for the sheet Robert. From their description I'd say it's a #3 car. So with a 25% plus up for a SS/RS, it's a 35-40 K car. That's good to know.
Now I just have to get him to do the trade. If he's really serious, which he sounds like he is, I'll do some more looking at the car and drive it. I'm going to tune it up for him next week and will get to drive it and go over it more then when I have it over in my garage.
The bad part for now is the economy, prices are just not holding on anything. My bike would easily be a 25K bike if the market was there, but it's not. There's THAT much custom work done to it. But a classic car is a different story as far as value goes.
If the trade dosen't work out, no big deal. I'll still get to ride my bike and I'm sure I can borrow the car on occasion if I really wanted to.
__________________
Have you THANKED a VETERAN lately for the freedoms you take for granted each day?
Thanks for the sheet Robert. From their description I'd say it's a #3 car. So with a 25% plus up for a SS/RS, it's a 35-40 K car. That's good to know.
If it can be documented as a REAL SS...but from what you posted initially, it very well could be a clone...so safer bet is to value it as a non-SS V8 with the +20% RS bump...don't assume you can find the next guy willing to assume it's probably an SS and pay as such.
(And note that pricing sheet is for SS models, not base coupes...so you'd need to get hold of the base pricing sheet to calculate a SS vs non-SS pricing comparison.)
Still sounds like a great deal, especially for a rot-free California car...but if he's willing to take $15K value, that should be your key that it's likely a clone and NOT an actual $35K Camaro SS/RS.
In this market, I doubt it's a $35-40k Camaro. You can find numbers matching cars going for that price range (or just a bit over).
I agree that it would hold value better than the bike though. Without the original drivetrain, I doubt that it being an original RS/SS or not really has much impact on the value, so don't let that really sway your decision to do the deal.
Sounds like it would be a cool car to get and then do some modifications so it will handle a lot better. New front suspension part, bolt in steering rack conversion and a bolt in 4 link for the rear would make it handle way better and be more fun to drive. Maybe you can do all that for $5-10k, so it's not a total budget killer if you do it in stages.
Because the car isn't original, doing those mods won't hurt the value of the car either.
Sounds kind of like an even swap if you can't verify what the car is. Besides, the original engine is gone, so even if you could verify it as an SS, it isn't numbers matching.
Do you like the car? Have you wanted one? Are you going to drive it? If yes, then grab it.
But I thought you could send the VIN in to some GM website and get the built sheet that would tell you what the car is? For a fee of course. Also, trim tag should also help identify the car. Should be able to tell if the trim tag has been tampered with.
What is anything worth? What someone is willing to pay for it.
The market on muscle cars is still very soft. A non-numbers matching, non-original, non documented GM muscle car is just like anything else: Not worth much. You can guess all day long what the car originated as 40 years ago, but without documentation -its simply a guess, -and you can't market 'Guesswork' when selling a car.
rjjablo has it right: why would someone trade a $35,000 car for a $13,000 motorcycle thats falling faster in value than the car??? No one leaves that kind of money on the table.
...and don't calculate what a car is worth based upon how much someone has put into it: receipts don't equate value/equity. Fair Market Value is exactly that = FAIR
__________________
351W, Spyder intake, ported, polished, roller everything, nasty cam... the full meal deal. live axle. Silver with black stripes- built to be driven.
Last edited by Dago; 09-16-2012 at 02:46 PM..
Reason: caps lock mis-spell
Z22 Rally Sport Package and Z27 Camaro Super Sport Package would be numbers to look for. Locate the build sheet (if possible, usually under the rear seat) and cross reference the numbers in the first link below.
Yes I know a car is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Like I said, he got the car on a deal, paid 13K for it with a new paint job.
The car was built in Van Nuys as per the VIN and the Trim tag. Unfortunatly Van Nuys did not use the X code to denote a SS. There is nothing on their trim code that will tell you it is a true SS. There are no GM records to run the VIN on that will tell you it is a SS. About the only thing that will is the original Protect-o-plate, if it can be found.
It does have the correct front disc which were on the SS and I'm going to check the rear which should be a 12 bolt for the SS. It has all of the correct interior and exterior SS markings along with the correct RS markings. So if it is a clone, someone did a good job at makeing it a clone and let it go for cheap.
I should get the car on Wed to do some work on it for him and to check it out. It's a great looking car from what I've seen so far. I'll make a final decision on the trade after I get the chance to really look it over. If I do the trade, yes it will be driven. I don't do trailer queens.
As for my bike, it's a full up custom build that I did. I've got about 35K into the build.
__________________
Have you THANKED a VETERAN lately for the freedoms you take for granted each day?
There are a few things that can help you spot an RS car too.
Look on this page: Camaro Factory Options
Take a bunch of pictures and if you still have questions, post them over at Camaros.net. There are some guys there that can spot a recreation in a heartbeat.
Nice scoot. I would do the trade in a heart beat. The 06 RG has the older frame and engine mounts and the difference between the 06 and anything after 09 is night and day. They handle better, ride smoother, stop better, larger gas tank, better engine. The change or improvements to technology that HD has done would make it easy for me. Just my .02. Good luck.
Unless something is not right, and that Camaro is full of Bondo, seems like a no brainer trade. Bike will depreciate, car not. I'd be a bit worried about a 69 Camaro with a "Fresh" paint job. eh hmmm, lots of new bondo which still looks good for the moment.
1987 Buick Grand National (All original with only 16k miles)
1965 Buick Riviera Gran Sport (Currently undergoing a frame off restoration)
1965 Buick Riviera 401 car, unrestored survivor, driver.
2005 F150 FX4, Supercrew (Daily Driver)
2001 Dodge Grand Caravan (Beater)
1987 Buick Grand National (All original with only 16k miles)
1965 Buick Riviera Gran Sport (Currently undergoing a frame off restoration)
1965 Buick Riviera 401 car, unrestored survivor, driver.
2005 F150 FX4, Supercrew (Daily Driver)
2001 Dodge Grand Caravan (Beater)
OK I got to spend some time with the car yesterday. He has a lot of papers and recipts for the car. Car was built and sold in LA. Second buyer paid 11K for it and used it during his college days before making money and moving to Santa Barbara. Car sat for many years. Current owner, my neighbor, recently bought it for 13K. He knows the guy really well that he bought it from. He's always buying and selling cars and such. One paper he has I beleive is from the original owner that says it is a true SS/RS and not a clone. I want to go thru his papers when I get the chance. Overall it's a good driver, not a show car or numbers matching. IF it is a clone, someone did a damn good job at it.
Body: Seems to be pretty straight. Paint looks good albiet not a show paint job. But a good daily driver paint. I only found bondo in the middle of the passenger door around the door crease. No other bondo anywhere that one would expect to find it. So either the car didn't have bad cancer or it was replaced with sheet metal. Also this is the second repaint of the car. First was to go from factory silver to burgandy. Also it has all of the correct SS and RS markings and parts. The RS on the grill was recently added on but does not go. The front nose upper and lower sheet metal was replaced as it was dented on the nose but the grill is original. SS stripes are on the hood and trunk but not the roof. The holes for the 350 emblem on the front fender have been filled in.
Undercar: From the looks under the car, it's all original. Front disc and 12 bolt rear. From the paper work, they replaced the stock sway bar with a bigger one, added lowering springs to the front and deacrched the rear leafs. Slapper bars were added. Rims are aftermarket 15" with original center cap.
Engine: is a 350 and runs well. The numbers stamped on the front of the block I came out with say a '69 truck. But his paperwork shows a '89 corvette LT1. So I need to do a little mor research. Has AFR heads, HEI dist, eldebrock intake and carb and headers. TH 350 tranny.
Interior: Has all of the stock stuff except the center console gauges. Seats were recently redone as it seems the previous owners girlfriend took a knife to the seats. Gee, that never seems to hapen. ODO shows 11K miles so I can only assume that it's rolled once and that is 111K miles. I'd have to check the DMV paperwork and see for sure. The only thing I'm not sure of is that there is no tach on the right side of the dash. Maybe it was installed in the console gauge pack. Got to do a little more research. It does have factory air. ( just found a few pictures and the gauges are correct. No tach or clock was availble on the SS)
Overall: Car starts and drives nice. Brakes are good. It seems to shift quick when going slow but will stay in gear longer if you get on the gas. It rides nice and has only minor slop in the steeringwheel. It dosen't look like the suspension has been touched other than the springs and sway bar, which is missing some end link bushings that wore out. Mootor runs smoothly and seems to be a basic stock build, no high HP motor here. But it will move along fairly quick.
So I told him again last night after we were done working on it/driving it that the trade was stil on the table. Ball is now in his court. We'll see what happens.
__________________
Have you THANKED a VETERAN lately for the freedoms you take for granted each day?
Looks nice. I'd make the trade in a heartbeat...if he's talking about an even swap. The chances of the economy getting so strong that you could get 30k for your bike are pretty slim.
The tach was an option on all the cars...just because it's an SS doesn't mean it had to come with a tach. I've seen z/28's that didn't have a tach.
If you got the tach, then you had to have the center console too.
Does look like it has all the right RS trim pieces. How do the rear back-up lights look? Maybe unscrew one and make sure the opening looks factory stamped.
Engine: is a 350 and runs well. The numbers stamped on the front of the block I came out with say a '69 truck. But his paperwork shows a '89 corvette LT1. So I need to do a little mor research. Has AFR heads, HEI dist, eldebrock intake and carb and headers. TH 350 tranny.
No such thing as an '89 Corvette LT1...it would have been an L98 Tuned Port Injection motor...the LT-1 (Gen II smallblock with reverse-cooling & opti-spark) was '93-'96...
At this point you have 2X repaint...redone interior...non-original motor...so any 'true SS' value is pretty well gone...no way you're going to be able to get it back to numbers-matching stock for Barett Jackson. Consider the deal on whether it's fair for a solid, V8, '69 Camaro...
And with the interior being redone, slim chance of finding the build sheet under/behind the rear seat (IIRC), on the top of the gas tank, behind door panels, inside the headliner, under the carpet or stuck up under the dash. Time to dig into the interior again, lol.
No such thing as an '89 Corvette LT1...it would have been an L98 Tuned Port Injection motor...the LT-1 (Gen II smallblock with reverse-cooling & opti-spark) was '93-'96...
At this point you have 2X repaint...redone interior...non-original motor...so any 'true SS' value is pretty well gone...no way you're going to be able to get it back to numbers-matching stock for Barett Jackson. Consider the deal on whether it's fair for a solid, V8, '69 Camaro...
1989 Corvette Engines
Engine
HP/TQ
0-60
Quarter Mile
5.7L V-8 L98
240 HP @ 4000 RPM
345lb-ft @ 3200 RPM
6.3 sec
15.1 sec @ 93mph
5.7L V-8 L98 Twin Turbo
345 HP
465lb-ft
N/A
N/A
Back to top
1989 Corvette VIN Decoder
Engine Codes
ZRA
5.7L V-8 L98 240 HP, 350ci
__________________ BE SAFE!!!!!
Marshall
"Conmech"
Retired U.S. NAVY SEABEE CONSTRUCTION MECHANIC
10+ years GATOR (AMPHIBIOUS) SEABEES
Hi,
If this is a California rust free car the trade or price is worth it....
I hate to pick but the emblem would be a SS not RS. The SS package overrode the RS package.
The car should have a 12 bolt rearend and frt disc brakes. Does it have a cowl induction air filter to match the cowl hood.
__________________
Mike Forte
Forte's Parts Connection
40 Pearl Street
Framingham, Mass. 01702 mikeforte302@gmail.com
508 875 0016 www.fortesparts.com http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/...?v=info&ref=ts
The Early Ford & FE Tremec were also originals from Mike. The Mustang firewall adjustable quadrant kit also is an original from Mike. His latest developments are external slave clutch release conversions & cable release conversions too.
Tremec Elite Distributor for: T-5, T-56, T-56 Magnum & TKO-500 & TKO-600
TKO-500 & TKO-600 Midshifter, Front shifter, offset Corvette shifter and more...
A REAL SPEED SHOP with parts, price & knowledge....
Est: 1981 selling & building performance parts to build your dream car...
FORD RACING & QUICKTIME DISTRIBUTOR. NEW 5 LUG AXLES & BRAKE KITS & NEW 8.8\" REAREND IN BOTH IRS & FOX AXLE.
I would trade my last 3 bikes together for that. But I LOVE 69 Camaros. I could personally care less about it being a clone or not. I like an RS/SS because it was the best looking version. Sure an original car is always going to be worth more, but then it was a 427 Yenko you'd be afraid to drive it anywhere and could't afford to insure or repair it. The Harley market is FLOODED. And as beautiful as your bike is, it has a more narrow appeal than a clean 69 Camaro. Damn California guys and your rust free cars.
Welcome to FFCars! The
representations expressed are the representations and opinions of
the FFCars.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. This website
has been planned and developed by FFCars.com and its forum members
and should not be construed as being endorsed by Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company for any
purpose. "FFR", "Factory Five", "Factory Five Racing", and the
Factory Five Racing logo are registered trademarks of Factory Five
Racing, Inc. FFCars.com forum members agree not to
post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is
owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages
posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these
messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason
whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your
messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with
respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s).
Thank you for visiting the FFCars.com Forum dedicated to Factory
Five.