hello, just purchased a mark III, (very nicely done from illinios)(bought it in sept still trying to title it in NJ!) getting to know it, is has a 1996 4.6 mustang gt motor, with power rack, my question is, it is very sensitive, is there a way to make it less sensitive, it drives straight, handles well, just very sensitive, any help would be great.
As mentioned, check aligment and also the tire pressure, it should be around 24#. A lot of us performed the cut-spring mod where a few coils are cut from the regulator spring in the PS pump to reduce pressure/assist.
Greg
__________________
FFR4373 MK3, nondonor, DIY options/mods/paint, Lexus indigo/Viper silver, Hydroboost PS&PB/discs/ABS, AC/heat, 3-link/Konis, FMS302E, Holley 600DP/Airgap, 4X4 exhaust, Halibrand deep lip chrome CobraIII, TeamIII spinners, rollbars: chrome full & single
no, do not have any specs, 24 pounds of front pressure? it's now 38 pounds! ffr build date is mark iii 2004, the steering is very responsive, needs a light hand, i am used to manual steering on my 1940 ford sedan street rod, maybe just need to get used to it, thanks to all
Last edited by bucketlist; 10-18-2012 at 11:59 AM..
Get the tire pressures down to the 24# range first. Toe, Camber and Caster can all affect the twitchy issue. Find out how the car is set up before you start cutting anything.
Start by setting your tire pressure. 23 F 26 R. Next count the number of steering wheel turns from lock to lock just to know what you've got. 3.0 is good and very driveable. 2.5 is very quick and responds in a big way to very small inputs. You need to pay attention to what you're doing with the wheel all the time. 2.25 LTL is rediculously quick unless you are doing autocrossing. Check that you have correct toe setting. 1/16" Toe in total. Toe out will make the car want to take off. If the steering feels light check the caster. FFR says 3 - 5° but many run more. More improves road feel and tracking with power steering. If you have 5+ caster and it still feels light then consider either a Heid'ts valve or cutting the relief spring. I like the Heidt's valve because of it's adjustability.
All good comments above regarding tire pressure (38 is way high!), rack ratio and alignment. With power steering you can get real agressive with positive caster, like 7 to 9 degrees, to stabilize the car. Your alignment guy might look at you like you have 3 heads when you ask for that but trust us! When you go with the higher caster ranges be aware that you'll most likely need longer adjuster sleeves on the forward links of the upper control arms (SEE THIS). As Frank mentioned be sure that it is set for TOE IN; toe out will cause it to feel darty and too sensitive.
With a proper setup even a car with a 2.25 turn rack will feel stable at full boost.
All good comments above regarding tire pressure (38 is way high!), rack ratio and alignment. With power steering you can get real agressive with positive caster, like 7 to 9 degrees, to stabilize the car. Your alignment guy might look at you like you have 3 heads when you ask for that but trust us! When you go with the higher caster ranges be aware that you'll most likely need longer adjuster sleeves on the forward links of the upper control arms (SEE THIS). As Frank mentioned be sure that it is set for TOE IN; toe out will cause it to feel darty and too sensitive.
With a proper setup even a car with a 2.25 turn rack will feel stable at full boost.
Good luck,
Jeff
X2 - Add Caster. Get 2 longer adjuster sleeves (Speedway sells them) as the stock ones will likely be too short and you will not have enough thread engagement. You've got power steering so the caster will really improve stability and will not make your steering feel heavy like it would with a non-assisted car.
Frank, Jeff, the 2.5 and 2.25 rack are the same ratio, the 2.25 has the plastic turn limiters. At least that the story I was told!
That may well be the case Rich. I've never had the two side by side to find out for sure but would be curious to know if it is a mechanical ratio difference or simply a travel limit. Either way it's a pretty small difference between them; one eighth of a turn either direction.
will do the tire pressure 38 to 28, thanks for all the suggestions, i do know that the rack is out of 96 mustang gt, 3 turns LTL? it does have longer adjuster sleeves. i am used to manual steering on my 1940 ford sedan street rod, maybe just need to get used to it, thanks to all
I have a similar set up. The tire pressure depends on the size of tires you run. 15" tires run different tire pressures. I run 17" tires and run 22 up front and 23 in the rear. These pressures work perfect with my kumo esta xs tires. I am running 255x40x17 on all 4 corners.
Like most have said, alignment, alignment alignment. Lots of Caster.
__________________
MKIII, 4.6 Sohc, 3 Link, Konis, FFR Lower Crtl Arms, 3.73 R & P, Champ Pan, GM Blue Granite Metallic W/Silver Strips by Bat Man
Last edited by Marty Prario; 10-19-2012 at 01:58 AM..
38 must be a death trap, i am all over the place at 24. i have crummy Sumimotos, though.
following the 1 psi per 100 pounds general rule, i'd easily recommend 22psi all around, go for a drive, see the HUGE difference, and be happy you have already improved the car for free.
then, bump it up from there.
but please tell us your exact tire sizes, brand, type. e.g. 17", Goodyear, All-season. or 17", Nitto, DOT track
Where in NJ are you. I would highly suggest you contact Mark Dougherty (he is right next to Hersey Pa). Talk to him and then spend a day in his shop. He will align the car to how you will drive it and check everything to make sure you are safe. Worth every penny.
Good info given
I too have done the "cut spring" mod as mentioned on Gregs build site. A must if useing the mustang rac kand pump set up.
You also need to increase the amount of caster. Increaseing the amount of caster will make the steering wheel want to return to center faster/easyer. Basicly it will require more effort to turn the wheel the more caster you have.
Once you have the cut spring mod along with correct alignment specs. You'll love the power steering option opposed to manual steering.
__________________
M III recieved 8-06, 3 link,lca\'s PS+PB,carb,302,373 gears, T5 first start 8/27/06.Go Kart 9/9/06 Tagged 10/24/06 Graduate 4-07
I had Sumitomos, and I took them off because I simply couldn't control the car. I went to Nitto NT05s in the front and NT05Rs in the back - a WORLD of difference. Caster also makes a huge difference. Caster adjustment should be specifically done for a power rack if that's what you have. I also agree with the others on tire pressure - for me, 24 Lbs is just about right, 28 is too much. If you do all three things, good tires, correct caster and correct tire pressure, your car will be much safer and easier to drive at speed and under acceleration, IMHO.
i have Sumis as well, go down to 22psi. that's most of us run on the street for overall handling and tire wear.
(Sumi's are known to wear in the center, even with 22psi on our cars.)
i have found that for autocrossing 22psi hot is the best. 21psi hot for me was understeer and 23psi was oversteer. i didn't experiment front/rear and your suspension setup will come into play.
Another rack idea is to use the slowest one available. I use one from a V-6 PS car, and I think it's 3:1 ratio, for even a slower response.
I also have a small crank pulley for reduced pump RPM.
Yes, like all above, alignment is a MAJOR factor.
Also, it is the nature of the beast, light weight, short weelbase, snap-spin.
__________________
FFR5148K MkII Roadster, FRP 306 345HP w/ carb, 3-link, disc brakes, Still Gel-Coat Grey! Now with roll cage and more track stuff, wrecked, beaten, man-handled, cut up, butchered, Freaky body mods, sat on by HOOTERS girls, still barely street legal.
I know it's counter intuitive compared to normal cars but try 22#, just try it!
__________________
FFR 5353K,351/400hp,TKO 500, 3-link w/3.08 and Truetrac, Koni DA coilovers front and rear,APE hardtop,Forte front and VPM rear swaybars
Welcome to FFCars! The
representations expressed are the representations and opinions of
the FFCars.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. This website
has been planned and developed by FFCars.com and its forum members
and should not be construed as being endorsed by Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company for any
purpose. "FFR", "Factory Five", "Factory Five Racing", and the
Factory Five Racing logo are registered trademarks of Factory Five
Racing, Inc. FFCars.com forum members agree not to
post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is
owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages
posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these
messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason
whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your
messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with
respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s).
Thank you for visiting the FFCars.com Forum dedicated to Factory
Five.