I have a single teflon lined AN hose from the fuel pump filter back by the fuel tank to the driver frame rail by the lower radiator hose.
Same here, I have no hard line, it's all braided hose from the tank to the carb. I just looked at my original invoice from Summit and it appears I have just rubber hose from Aeroquip FCA0615. For $2 more, I could have bought the teflon PTFE lined hose, FCC0615. I guess I didn't know what I didn't know. It does say the rubber liner is "compatible with most fuels, coolants, and oils", I thought that meant it was fine for gasoline, but maybe not for alcohol or some exotic fuel (nitro). After 6 years and 17k miles, I haven't had a hint of a leak, but I think I know what my winter project will be.
As for me a 55gal drum of Sunoco 260 GTX is waiting for my car. Yes, it is more expensive but so is the car. I have pure gasoline free from additives which harm the performance, gas mileage and on top it has 5 years shelf life (pump gas 4-6 Month).
I think there is still a lot of mis-information on AN hose, fittings, materials, and how to make them. Earl's store has a few vids on the topics. There are some on the WWW if you search Google for them.
The vid on OEM tubing adapters shows how to adapt to hard lines without flaring the tube. These use a compression ring technique. Flaring is a little more secure though, if you can get a flaring tool and a tube sleeve and nut on the tube. Here's a couple of pages on how to bend hard lines, flaring the ends and using tube sleeves and nuts to connect to AN adapters.
If you can cut back on the morning donuts and coffee for a few days, use the savings to get this book. It is a bible of many of the skills and information that will come in really handy when you build your car.
__________________
Racing: "The world's most efficient way to turn money into noise and smoke"
"Think with your dipstick, Jimmy"
"Anybody can BUY a car, only a chosen few build their own"
FFR Challenge car #4182SP Carbed 302, Holley 600CFM, E303 cam, T5, 3 link rear-3:55, Levy wheels, Kumho tires, Fire Safe fuel cell, Griffin race radiator, ISIS wiring system, MSD 6ALN NASCAR ignition, 85 Mustang distributor,
Last edited by ROADRACER83; 08-02-2012 at 02:43 PM..
After reading about SS fuel line problems, I am planning to switch to hard lines. I do not own a flaring tool, so I plan to use Earl's compression to -6an fitting. Is this the correct one? http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EAR-165006ERL/
Also, should I use 3/8" steel or aluminum tubing? Is either metal not compatible with the earl's fitting above? Aluminum sounds easier to install, but more vulnerable to damage?
Finally, I'll replace the remainder of SS braids with the Aeroquip mentioned in earlier posts.
My car is a carbed 392 with a mechanical pump. It is a low pressure system without a return line (set to 4psi). Assuming proper fit, I should be well within parameters of all components, right? Does anyone foresee issues I haven't? Thanks in advance.
I too want to go to current-fuel-compatible hoses! Right now I've got, as instructed in my MkII's manual, rubber hoses connecting the tank pipes to hard pipes in the RR wheel well, hard pipes leading to the front of the passenger wheel well where rubber hoses connect them to the hard pipes of the EEC IV fuel rails, with good ol' hose clamps holding it all together.
I'd like to do stuff like CobraCruz says, but with electronic injection, will the flare connectors handle the fuel line pressure? They're rated at 50 psi, which should be more than enough for carb, but does anyone know if this will work with EFI?
I'm actually converting from braided stainless steel. The Earls AN fitting should allow a pretty painless switch.
I'm leaning towards the 3/8" aluminum solid fuel line. In my mind, it seems like an easier tubing to work, but wonder if SS would be safer. The Earls compression ring seals around either metals equally, right?
Also, its probably wise to use the flares on EFI. I think using the compression ring on such high pressures is a bit risky. However, I'm probably the farthest from an expert. Any advice out there?
John,
I can't tell what kind of hose is under braided stainless sheath just by looking.
Maybe others can. The teflon lines from Aeroquip use different fittings than other stainless covered hose types.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johntennyson
These are the type of things we're talking about here, right?
__________________
FFR #7124 Mk 3.1, Levy 5 link, LCA's & brakes, 17" Halibrands, electric PS, SAI, Eibach springs, BOSS 427w, webers, hood louvers, tilt front. Delivered 12/23/09, 1st start 02/19/12. 1st go cart 03/03/12. Titled 10/3/12.
"I'm basing it on a collective interpretation of these particular cars. And whatever the hell I like". The Federalist Patriot Build blog: www.myersfamilyffrbuild.blogspot.com
These are the type of things we're talking about here, right?
These are on '50s MGs, so their fuel pumps only need to make enough pressure to keep the carbs full.
The second pic is for sure rubber hose under there. The top pic almost looks like teflon hose but the ferrules are wrong. Those are for air hoses and it looks like it was crimped on a dayco crimper.
__________________
MK4 delivery 12/17/11
Build thread: HERE
Epic First start video HERE
427w ford racing, stainless headers, 3link, tko600, 3.55 gears, Jim Inglese weber intake system and a custom paint job from Jeff Miller!
Type 65 Coupe Ordered 01/17/13
Build thread: HERE
347 w. stack injection, IRS, Levy arms, Levy front and rear brakes
It's the second picture I'm interested in, and the line on the left in particular. The braided sheath stuff on the right could be rubber underneath, but like brake hoses, you could make one out of teflon.
On the left, it looks like a copper pipe has been flared to take the fitting to connect it to the flex hose-- those are the fittings rated at 50 psi-- will they work at EFI pressure?
I was poking around on various hose sites a couple of months ago and I'll edit in the things I was looking at when I get a better chance later today. (Lunch break is ending!)
Welcome to FFCars! The
representations expressed are the representations and opinions of
the FFCars.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. This website
has been planned and developed by FFCars.com and its forum members
and should not be construed as being endorsed by Factory Five
Racing, Inc. or Ford Motor Company for any
purpose. "FFR", "Factory Five", "Factory Five Racing", and the
Factory Five Racing logo are registered trademarks of Factory Five
Racing, Inc. FFCars.com forum members agree not to
post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is
owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages
posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these
messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason
whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your
messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with
respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s).
Thank you for visiting the FFCars.com Forum dedicated to Factory
Five.